MUNA MISHRA ALIS CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA vs State of Bihar — 715/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,117,2,126,2,118,1,109,351,2,352,3/5. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010044432026

Filing Number

4223/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

715/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

11-ADJ-II

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

99

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,117,2,126,2,118,1,109,351,2,352,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNA MISHRA ALIS CHANDRA SHEKHAR MISHRA

    Adv. DIGVIJAY MISHRA

  2. 2.RAMESHWAR MISHRA

  3. 3.NANEHA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Munna Mishra, Rameshwar Mishra, and Naneha Mishra in connection with an assault case involving weapons and bamboo that caused injuries to five persons. Although the court noted the petitioners' clean criminal record and the underlying land dispute between brothers, it found the allegations serious and directed the petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail instead, with the trial court to decide without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-II

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 715/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Munna Mishra, Rameshwar Mishra, and Naneha Mishra in connection with an assault case involving weapons and bamboo that caused injuries to five persons. Although the court noted the petitioners' clean criminal record and the underlying land dispute between brothers, it found the allegations serious and directed the petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail instead, with the trial court to decide without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case