MANNU DUBEY ALIS MANNU KUMAR DUBEY vs State of Bihar — 714/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,354,504,506/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010044422026

Filing Number

4222/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

714/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

PHULWARIA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,354,504,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANNU DUBEY ALIS MANNU KUMAR DUBEY

    Adv. SHALINDRA KR. TIWARI

  2. 2.MANOJ DUBEY ALIS MANOJ KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 714/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mannu Dubey and Manoj Dubey, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 307, 504, and 506/34 in connection with a violent assault incident. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them (only general omnibus charges), the investigation revealed no involvement by these petitioners, and the case had been compromised between the parties with the informant appearing in court to support settlement. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 714/2026 The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mannu Dubey and Manoj Dubey, charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 307, 504, and 506/34 in connection with a violent assault incident. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them (only general omnibus charges), the investigation revealed no involvement by these petitioners, and the case had been compromised between the parties with the informant appearing in court to support settlement. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case