BINDA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 713/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,303,2,351,2,352,315. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010044402026
Filing Number
4220/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
713/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
25-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
591
Police Station
BHORE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BINDA DEVI
Adv. KHAJANCHI MISHRA
-
2.USHNAWATI DEVI
-
3.SHEOKUMARI DEVI
-
4.SONU KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Apr-2026
Order
Case Summary: 713/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Binda Devi, Ushnawati Devi, and Sheokumari Devi, finding that while they were named in the FIR for serious charges including extortion, assault, and theft, no specific overt acts were attributed to them and allegations were general and omnibus. The court noted witnesses contradicted the prosecution by stating no specific allegations against the petitioners and revealed an underlying land dispute between parties from the same village, with injuries being simple. Bail Conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each; one surety must be a close relative and one local; petitioners must cooperate in investigation/trial and not tamper with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 713/2026
Case Summary: 713/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Binda Devi, Ushnawati Devi, and Sheokumari Devi, finding that while they were named in the FIR for serious charges including extortion, assault, and theft, no specific overt acts were attributed to them and allegations were general and omnibus. The court noted witnesses contradicted the prosecution by stating no specific allegations against the petitioners and revealed an underlying land dispute between parties from the same village, with injuries being simple. Bail Conditions: Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each; one surety must be a close relative and one local; petitioners must cooperate in investigation/trial and not tamper with witnesses or evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts