SURAJ SAH vs State of Bihar — 258/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 461,379,327,34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010044362026

Filing Number

4216/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

258/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

175

Police Station

HATHUA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 461,379,327,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ SAH

    Adv. RAGHUVENDRA NARAYAN PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suraj Sah in a theft and criminal intimidation case, finding that while he was named in the FIR, no specific allegations were attributed to him—only general and omnibus charges. The court considered that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the case originated in 2021 with significant delay, an underlying land dispute existed, and the petitioner had been in custody since November 2025. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Suraj Sah in a theft and criminal intimidation case, finding that while he was named in the FIR, no specific allegations were attributed to him—only general and omnibus charges. The court considered that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the case originated in 2021 with significant delay, an underlying land dispute existed, and the petitioner had been in custody since November 2025. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case