SANJU DEVI vs State of Bihar — 711/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,498A,504/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010044342026
Filing Number
4214/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
711/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
189
Police Station
VISHAMBHARPUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJU DEVI
Adv. ABU SHAMIM ANSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-May-2026
Order
Case 711/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sanju Devi, who was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 498-A, 504/34 and DP Act sections 3/4 in a dowry harassment case, despite not being named in the original FIR. The court found this was a matrimonial dispute where the petitioner was merely implicated during investigation as the sister-in-law, and notably, the husband and wife reconciled during hearing, indicating cordial relations. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-May-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 711/2026
Case 711/2026 Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Sanju Devi, who was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 498-A, 504/34 and DP Act sections 3/4 in a dowry harassment case, despite not being named in the original FIR. The court found this was a matrimonial dispute where the petitioner was merely implicated during investigation as the sister-in-law, and notably, the husband and wife reconciled during hearing, indicating cordial relations. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts