SHIVJEE BHAGAT vs State of Bihar — 543/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed and disposed off on 23rd June 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRGO010044312025
Filing Number
4121/2025
Filing Date
13-May-2025
Registration No
543/2025
Registration Date
13-May-2025
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
29-Daj-IV
Decision Date
23-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed and disposed off
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVJEE BHAGAT
Adv. BABU LAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Jun-2026
Order
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition filed by Shivjee Bhagat and others challenging an SDM order requiring them to execute a bond of Rs.75,000 with sureties for maintaining peace in a land dispute. The court found the revision application infructuous because more than one year had elapsed since the original order's date, rendering it expired under Section 126 of the BNSS, which provides for a one-year validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jun-2026
Disposed
Daj-IV
-
04-May-2026
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Daj-IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
16-Feb-2026
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
05-Dec-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
29-Oct-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
12-Sep-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
18-Jul-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-III
-
18-Jun-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-III
-
14-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 543/2025
The Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition filed by Shivjee Bhagat and others challenging an SDM order requiring them to execute a bond of Rs.75,000 with sureties for maintaining peace in a land dispute. The court found the revision application infructuous because more than one year had elapsed since the original order's date, rendering it expired under Section 126 of the BNSS, which provides for a one-year validity period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts