RINKU DEVI vs State of Bihar — 256/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 356,1,308,1,79,352,351,1,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRGO010044292026
Filing Number
4211/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
11-ADJ-II
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
KATAIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RINKU DEVI
Adv. UDAY NARAYAN PANDEY
-
2.ASHOK YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Order
Case 256/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Gopalganj granted bail to Rinku Devi and Ashok Yadav, who were arrested for uploading abusive and defamatory Facebook content including photographs of the complainant's sister with threats. The court found the FIR appeared to be a counterblast to a prior financial dispute (with a 12-day registration delay), noted lack of proper digital evidence compliance under Section 65B, and observed a related cyber case had been compromised between parties. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including immediate deletion of social media posts and accounts, cooperation with trial proceedings, and automatic cancellation if similar offences recur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ-II
-
10-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2026
Case 256/2026 Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Gopalganj granted bail to Rinku Devi and Ashok Yadav, who were arrested for uploading abusive and defamatory Facebook content including photographs of the complainant's sister with threats. The court found the FIR appeared to be a counterblast to a prior financial dispute (with a 12-day registration delay), noted lack of proper digital evidence compliance under Section 65B, and observed a related cyber case had been compromised between parties. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with conditions including immediate deletion of social media posts and accounts, cooperation with trial proceedings, and automatic cancellation if similar offences recur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts