PRAKASH KUMAR RANJAN vs State of Bihar — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309,4. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010038422026

Filing Number

3657/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

441

Police Station

GOPALGANJ NAGAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH KUMAR RANJAN

    Adv. UDAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: B.P. No. 220/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected Prakash Kumar Ranjan's bail petition in a robbery case (U/S 309(4) B.N.S.) where he was accused of armed robbery of a motorcycle, phone, and cash. Although the petitioner was not named in the original FIR and claimed false implication from another case, the court rejected bail without examining the merits, noting concerns about concealment of facts, while permitting him to file a fresh bail application with additional grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.P. No. 220/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected Prakash Kumar Ranjan's bail petition in a robbery case (U/S 309(4) B.N.S.) where he was accused of armed robbery of a motorcycle, phone, and cash. Although the petitioner was not named in the original FIR and claimed false implication from another case, the court rejected bail without examining the merits, noting concerns about concealment of facts, while permitting him to file a fresh bail application with additional grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case