MERAJ ALI vs State of Bihar — 218/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1-B). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010038272026

Filing Number

3642/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

218/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

BARAULI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1-B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MERAJ ALI

    Adv. VISHAL CHAUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: Meraj Ali v. State of Bihar (218/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Meraj Ali, arrested under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a country-made katta was recovered from his possession during a police raid. The court noted that while the petitioner was named in the FIR and the weapon was recovered, no ammunition was found, no sanction report existed, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with specified sureties and conditions of cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 218/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Meraj Ali v. State of Bihar (218/2026) The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to Meraj Ali, arrested under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act after a country-made katta was recovered from his possession during a police raid. The court noted that while the petitioner was named in the FIR and the weapon was recovered, no ammunition was found, no sanction report existed, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents, warranting bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with specified sureties and conditions of cooperation in investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case