AASH YADAV ALIS AASHU YADAV vs State of Bihar — 26/2026

Case under Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRI. APPEAL

CNR: BRGO010037572026

Filing Number

3572/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AASH YADAV ALIS AASHU YADAV

    Adv. RAJESHWAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge at Gopalganj allowed the juvenile's bail appeal, setting aside the JJ Board's refusal order. The court held that under the Juvenile Justice Act, bail is a statutory right for juveniles, with the focus on reformation and rehabilitation rather than punishment; since the social investigation report showed no risk of criminal association or moral danger, and family support was available, the child's best interests required release to family care with conditions including counseling and probation supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Order

    ADJ-I

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge at Gopalganj allowed the juvenile's bail appeal, setting aside the JJ Board's refusal order. The court held that under the Juvenile Justice Act, bail is a statutory right for juveniles, with the focus on reformation and rehabilitation rather than punishment; since the social investigation report showed no risk of criminal association or moral danger, and family support was available, the child's best interests required release to family care with conditions including counseling and probation supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case