SARWAR ALI vs State of Bihar — 216/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,338,336,3,340,2,318,4,352,351,2. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRGO010037102026
Filing Number
3527/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
216/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
24-ADJ-IX
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
677
Police Station
KATAIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARWAR ALI
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR PATHAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Order
SUMMARY: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted bail to Sarwar Ali in a case involving allegations of fraud in overseas visa processing. The court found that while the accused was charged under non-bailable sections (316(2) and 318(4) BNS), case diary evidence showed the visa was actually a working visa rather than a tourist visa as alleged, and the petitioner's custody period since February 20, 2026, warranted release. The petitioner was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to Section 480(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ-IX
-
10-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
ADJ-IX
-
08-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
ADJ-IX
-
06-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
ADJ-IX
-
25-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
ADJ-IX
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
ADJ-IX
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 216/2026
SUMMARY: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted bail to Sarwar Ali in a case involving allegations of fraud in overseas visa processing. The court found that while the accused was charged under non-bailable sections (316(2) and 318(4) BNS), case diary evidence showed the visa was actually a working visa rather than a tourist visa as alleged, and the petitioner's custody period since February 20, 2026, warranted release. The petitioner was ordered released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to Section 480(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts