RITESH UPADHYAY ALIS MUSKAN UPADHYAY vs State of Bihar — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303,2,62,,317,5,111,112,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010037052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3522/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

19-ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

354

Police Station

BAIKUNTHPUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303,2,62,,317,5,111,112,3/5

Petitioner(s)

RITESH UPADHYAY ALIS MUSKAN UPADHYAY

Adv. PRAVEEN CHANDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 19-ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

25-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ADMISSION

12-03-2026

ADMISSION

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, rejected the bail application of Ritesh Upadhyay (alias Muskan Upadhyay) in a tractor theft case. The court found that the petitioner was involved in dealing with stolen property, as a stolen tractor was recovered from his house based on confessions of apprehended thieves, and he has prior criminal antecedents. The judge distinguished his case from a co-accused who was granted bail, determining that the circumstances did not warrant bail in this instance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, rejected the bail application of Ritesh Upadhyay (alias Muskan Upadhyay) in a tractor theft case. The court found that the petitioner was involved in dealing with stolen property, as a stolen tractor was recovered from his house based on confessions of apprehended thieves, and he has prior criminal antecedents. The judge distinguished his case from a co-accused who was granted bail, determining that the circumstances did not warrant bail in this instance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Gopalganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case