HIRALAL RAM vs State of Bihar — 214/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010037042026

Filing Number

3521/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

15-ADJ-III

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

PHULWARIA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRALAL RAM

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR RAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court granted bail to petitioner Hiralal Ram in a dacoity case (IPC Section 394), finding that he was not named in the FIR, was implicated solely on a co-accused's confession with no recovery from his possession, and had already spent significant time in custody while co-accused were previously granted bail. He was ordered released on Rs. 30,000 bail with two sureties, subject to conditions including a family member as surety and an undertaking against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-III

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-III

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-III

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-III

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-III

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-III

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to petitioner Hiralal Ram in a dacoity case (IPC Section 394), finding that he was not named in the FIR, was implicated solely on a co-accused's confession with no recovery from his possession, and had already spent significant time in custody while co-accused were previously granted bail. He was ordered released on Rs. 30,000 bail with two sureties, subject to conditions including a family member as surety and an undertaking against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case