KUMARI RANJU YADAV vs State of Bihar — 213/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,118,1,109,308,2,352,351,3,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010036922026

Filing Number

3509/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

213/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

11-ADJ-II

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

353

Police Station

HATHUA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,118,1,109,308,2,352,351,3,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMARI RANJU YADAV

    Adv. RAJKISHOR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of Kumari Ranju Yadav, accused of assaulting her mother-in-law with bricks on the head on December 9, 2025. The court found the offense serious due to the vital nature of the head injury, evidence of intent to kill, and an underlying matrimonial dispute, deeming regular bail inappropriate at this stage. The petitioner may renew her bail application at the time of charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-II

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-II

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-II

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-II

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-II

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 213/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of Kumari Ranju Yadav, accused of assaulting her mother-in-law with bricks on the head on December 9, 2025. The court found the offense serious due to the vital nature of the head injury, evidence of intent to kill, and an underlying matrimonial dispute, deeming regular bail inappropriate at this stage. The petitioner may renew her bail application at the time of charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case