HEMANT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 212/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318,4,303,2,336,2,338,336,3,340,2,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010036832026

Filing Number

3500/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

212/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

20-ADJ-VII

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

GOPALGANJ NAGAR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318,4,303,2,336,2,338,336,3,340,2,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMANT KUMAR

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Order

    The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj rejected the bail application of Hemant Kumar, accused of ATM fraud and related offenses under IPC sections 318(4), 303(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5). The court found that the applicant was arrested with four different ATM cards and ₹7,200 in cash, had a prior criminal history with similar charges, and the serious nature of the crime made bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-VII

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 212/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj rejected the bail application of Hemant Kumar, accused of ATM fraud and related offenses under IPC sections 318(4), 303(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5). The court found that the applicant was arrested with four different ATM cards and ₹7,200 in cash, had a prior criminal history with similar charges, and the serious nature of the crime made bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case