HEMANT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 212/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318,4,303,2,336,2,338,336,3,340,2,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 23rd April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRGO010036832026
Filing Number
3500/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
212/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
20-ADJ-VII
Decision Date
23rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
29
Police Station
GOPALGANJ NAGAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMANT KUMAR
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 20-ADJ-VII
Disposed
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 08-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 01-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 24-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj rejected the bail application of Hemant Kumar, accused of ATM fraud and related offenses under IPC sections 318(4), 303(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5). The court found that the applicant was arrested with four different ATM cards and ₹7,200 in cash, had a prior criminal history with similar charges, and the serious nature of the crime made bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj rejected the bail application of Hemant Kumar, accused of ATM fraud and related offenses under IPC sections 318(4), 303(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), and 3(5). The court found that the applicant was arrested with four different ATM cards and ₹7,200 in cash, had a prior criminal history with similar charges, and the serious nature of the crime made bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts