UMESH KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 581/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,2,318,4,173. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010036062026

Filing Number

3427/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

581/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

20-ADJ-VII

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

MOHAMMADPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316,2,318,4,173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESH KUMAR

    Adv. NAVNEET KUMAR OJHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to Umesh Kumar under Section 482(2) CrPC, finding insufficient evidence against him in a corruption case involving alleged extortion of ₹25,000 from a beneficiary of a rural housing scheme. The court noted that witnesses failed to confirm the accused's voice in the audio clip, he had no prior criminal history, and the investigation was still ongoing, making bail appropriate to prevent arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-VII

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VII

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 581/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to Umesh Kumar under Section 482(2) CrPC, finding insufficient evidence against him in a corruption case involving alleged extortion of ₹25,000 from a beneficiary of a rural housing scheme. The court noted that witnesses failed to confirm the accused's voice in the audio clip, he had no prior criminal history, and the investigation was still ongoing, making bail appropriate to prevent arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case