HALCHAL DEBEY ALIS ARUN KUMAR DUBEY vs State of Bihar — 210/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010035842026

Filing Number

3405/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

210/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

19-ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

316

Police Station

BHORE

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HALCHAL DEBEY ALIS ARUN KUMAR DUBEY

    Adv. SANTOSH CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court rejected the bail application of Halchal Dubey, who is accused of kidnapping a minor girl along with others and attempting sexual assault, charges under the POCSO Act. The judge found the allegations serious and credible based on the victim's statement recorded during investigation, noting that compromise has no validity in heinous crimes against minors, and therefore bail was not appropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-VI-Cum-POCSO Special Court

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Halchal Dubey, who is accused of kidnapping a minor girl along with others and attempting sexual assault, charges under the POCSO Act. The judge found the allegations serious and credible based on the victim's statement recorded during investigation, noting that compromise has no validity in heinous crimes against minors, and therefore bail was not appropriate given the gravity of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case