SHRIKANT YADAV vs State of Bihar — 571/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20,22,25,29. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010035142026

Filing Number

3341/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

571/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

KUCHAIKOT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20,22,25,29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT YADAV

    Adv. RANJAN KUMAR SRIVASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Shrikant Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a drug smuggling case under NDPS Act sections 20, 22, 25, 29. The court found that co-accused persons were caught with 10 kg of ganja, with confessional statements implicating the petitioner as the contraband supplier, and witness testimony supported the prosecution's case, making it a serious offense with ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 571/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Shrikant Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a drug smuggling case under NDPS Act sections 20, 22, 25, 29. The court found that co-accused persons were caught with 10 kg of ganja, with confessional statements implicating the petitioner as the contraband supplier, and witness testimony supported the prosecution's case, making it a serious offense with ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case