SUBASH MAHATO vs State of Bihar — 570/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,303,2,109,3/5. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010035132026
Filing Number
3340/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
570/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
342
Police Station
GOPALPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBASH MAHATO
Adv. RAM NATH SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 570/2026 - SUBASH MAHATO v. State of Bihar Decision: The court disposed of the anticipatory bail petition by directing petitioner Subash Mahto to surrender before the lower court and file for regular bail within 30 days, with the lower court to decide bail in accordance with law. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner was accused of inflicting a Gandasi blow causing the informant's head injury and unconsciousness, the court found mitigating factors: both parties are pattidar (agricultural co-sharers) involved in a mutual dispute; injuries were simple in nature from blunt force; petitioner has no criminal antecedents; and the matter appears to be a free-fighting case with counter-cases between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 570/2026
Case Summary: 570/2026 - SUBASH MAHATO v. State of Bihar Decision: The court disposed of the anticipatory bail petition by directing petitioner Subash Mahto to surrender before the lower court and file for regular bail within 30 days, with the lower court to decide bail in accordance with law. Key Reasoning: Although the petitioner was accused of inflicting a Gandasi blow causing the informant's head injury and unconsciousness, the court found mitigating factors: both parties are pattidar (agricultural co-sharers) involved in a mutual dispute; injuries were simple in nature from blunt force; petitioner has no criminal antecedents; and the matter appears to be a free-fighting case with counter-cases between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts