SUNITA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 560/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3,5. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010033982026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3230/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

560/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

BHORE

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3,5

Petitioner(s)

SUNITA DEVI

Adv. SONA BISWAS

SHIVSHANKAR SINGH

LAKHPATIYA DEVI

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

25-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

ADMISSION

09-03-2026

ADMISSION

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sunita Devi and Sivshankar Singh in connection with a case involving alleged armed robbery and assault. The court found that the petitioners are named in the FIR with credible allegations of encircling and assaulting the informant's son, with Sunita Devi accused of inflicting a knife blow causing bleeding injuries, and directed the petitioners to surrender before the lower court within 30 days to seek regular bail, which shall be considered in accordance with law without prejudice from this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Sunita Devi and Sivshankar Singh in connection with a case involving alleged armed robbery and assault. The court found that the petitioners are named in the FIR with credible allegations of encircling and assaulting the informant's son, with Sunita Devi accused of inflicting a knife blow causing bleeding injuries, and directed the petitioners to surrender before the lower court within 30 days to seek regular bail, which shall be considered in accordance with law without prejudice from this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Gopalganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case