OMI JAISAWAL vs State of Bihar — 186/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115,2,126,2,118,2,109,351,2,352,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRGO010030402026
Filing Number
2881/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
01
Police Station
BHORE
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OMI JAISAWAL
Adv. UDAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Order
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Omi Jaiswal, who was accused of assaulting an informant's nephew with a dab during a payment dispute in a cloth shop. The court approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering the petitioner's lengthy custody since February 2026, the prolonged trial timeline, and inconsistencies between allegations and medical records, while noting co-accused had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2026
The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to petitioner Omi Jaiswal, who was accused of assaulting an informant's nephew with a dab during a payment dispute in a cloth shop. The court approved bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, considering the petitioner's lengthy custody since February 2026, the prolonged trial timeline, and inconsistencies between allegations and medical records, while noting co-accused had already been granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts