URMILA DEVI vs RAMDEYAL MAHTO — 9/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th April 2026.
MISC. CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: BRGO010029232025
Filing Number
206/2025
Filing Date
29-Mar-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
29-Mar-2025
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
3-ADJ-I
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.URMILA DEVI
Adv. SATYENDRA RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMDEYAL MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Order
Case Summary: Urmila Devi v. Ramdeyal Mahto (9/2025) The appellate court set aside the lower court's rejection of Urmila Devi's interim injunction petition concerning disputed ancestral land. The court found the lower court's order procedurally defective—the respondents' written statement and the order were passed on the same day without proper service to appellant's counsel, raising doubts about fair hearing. The appellate court remanded the case for fresh consideration, requiring the lower court to properly address the three mandatory injunction criteria: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ-I
-
22-Apr-2026
Order
ADJ-I
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
11-Feb-2026
Order
ADJ-I
-
30-Jan-2026
Order
ADJ-I
-
16-Jan-2026
Order
ADJ-I
-
09-Jan-2026
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
30-Oct-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
25-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ-I
-
01-Sep-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
20-Aug-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
30-Jul-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
07-Jul-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
17-Jun-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
27-May-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
09-May-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
23-Apr-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADJ-I
-
08-Apr-2025
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2025
Case Summary: Urmila Devi v. Ramdeyal Mahto (9/2025) The appellate court set aside the lower court's rejection of Urmila Devi's interim injunction petition concerning disputed ancestral land. The court found the lower court's order procedurally defective—the respondents' written statement and the order were passed on the same day without proper service to appellant's counsel, raising doubts about fair hearing. The appellate court remanded the case for fresh consideration, requiring the lower court to properly address the three mandatory injunction criteria: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts