BABUJAN MIYAN vs State of Bihar — 487/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,1,76,303,2,352. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010028052026

Filing Number

2662/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

487/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

BAIKUNTHPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,1,76,303,2,352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABUJAN MIYAN

    Adv. BIPIN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Babujan Miyan in a case involving allegations of theft of a gold chain, assault, and murder. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR, there were only general and ornibus allegations against him with no specific overt act, one witness denied involvement by the petitioner, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail. The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperating in investigation and not tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 487/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Babujan Miyan in a case involving allegations of theft of a gold chain, assault, and murder. The court found that while the petitioner was named in the FIR, there were only general and ornibus allegations against him with no specific overt act, one witness denied involvement by the petitioner, and co-accused persons had already been granted bail. The petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to cooperating in investigation and not tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case