SUDISH MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 486/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,2,109,351,3,352,74,76,3,5. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010028032026
Filing Number
2660/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
486/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
SIDHWALIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUDISH MAHTO
Adv. JAHANGIR ALAM
SUNITA DEVI
MEENA DEVI
SARSWATI DEVI
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three female petitioners (Sunita Devi, Meena Devi, and Sarswati Devi) in a case involving charges of assault and theft arising from a drainage water dispute. The court found insufficient specific allegations against these women and noted a two-day delay in FIR filing without cogent reason, coupled with their clean criminal records. However, bail was denied to petitioner Sudish Mahto, against whom specific allegations of inflicting a farsa blow existed, with directions to surrender and seek regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three female petitioners (Sunita Devi, Meena Devi, and Sarswati Devi) in a case involving charges of assault and theft arising from a drainage water dispute. The court found insufficient specific allegations against these women and noted a two-day delay in FIR filing without cogent reason, coupled with their clean criminal records. However, bail was denied to petitioner Sudish Mahto, against whom specific allegations of inflicting a farsa blow existed, with directions to surrender and seek regular bail before the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts