SURENDRA DEWEDI vs State of Bihar — 483/2026

Case under Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act 2016 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010027912026

Filing Number

2649/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

483/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

Madya Nishedh Excise

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act 2016 Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA DEWEDI

    Adv. YOGENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The Gopalganj Exclusive Special Excise Court rejected Surendra Dewedi's anticipatory bail petition filed under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found that the petitioner owned a motorcycle from which 18 liters of country-made and foreign liquor was recovered during a vehicle check on 27.02.2025, and that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act, particularly given the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 483/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Gopalganj Exclusive Special Excise Court rejected Surendra Dewedi's anticipatory bail petition filed under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found that the petitioner owned a motorcycle from which 18 liters of country-made and foreign liquor was recovered during a vehicle check on 27.02.2025, and that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act, particularly given the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case