SATTAN MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 164/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,12,109,351,3,352,74,76,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010027442026

Filing Number

2605/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

164/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

SIDHWALIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,12,109,351,3,352,74,76,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATTAN MAHTO

    Adv. JAHANGIR ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Sattan Mahto in a case involving alleged assault and theft during a drainage water dispute. The court found no specific overt act against the petitioner, the theft allegation was "ornamental," and there was an unexplained two-day delay in filing the FIR, coupled with his clean criminal record and lengthy custody period. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on condition that he not threaten the informant or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Sattan Mahto in a case involving alleged assault and theft during a drainage water dispute. The court found no specific overt act against the petitioner, the theft allegation was "ornamental," and there was an unexplained two-day delay in filing the FIR, coupled with his clean criminal record and lengthy custody period. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on condition that he not threaten the informant or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case