AMIT KUMAR RAI vs State of Bihar — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191.3, 190, 308.3, 324,2,3, 333. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010026382026

Filing Number

2504/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191.3, 190, 308.3, 324,2,3, 333
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR RAI

    Adv. TUNTUN RAM AKELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted bail to petitioner Amit Kumar Rai in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod and firearms under BNS sections 191(3), 190, 308(3), 324(2), 324(3), 333, and the Arms Act. The court found the allegations against the petitioner were general and omnibus with no specific evidence, no firearm injuries sustained, and nothing recovered from the crime scene, while co-accused persons had already been granted bail by higher courts on similar grounds. Rai was released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties and five conditions, including cooperation in trial, filing affidavits regarding prior criminal cases, maintaining distance from the informant, and an undertaking that any future similar offense would result in automatic bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 159/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted bail to petitioner Amit Kumar Rai in a case involving alleged assault with an iron rod and firearms under BNS sections 191(3), 190, 308(3), 324(2), 324(3), 333, and the Arms Act. The court found the allegations against the petitioner were general and omnibus with no specific evidence, no firearm injuries sustained, and nothing recovered from the crime scene, while co-accused persons had already been granted bail by higher courts on similar grounds. Rai was released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties and five conditions, including cooperation in trial, filing affidavits regarding prior criminal cases, maintaining distance from the informant, and an undertaking that any future similar offense would result in automatic bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case