LUTAWAN MAHTO vs State of Bihar — 436/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,303,2,109,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010025182026

Filing Number

2392/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

436/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

342

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,303,2,109,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LUTAWAN MAHTO

    Adv. RAM NATH SAHU

  2. 2.KIRHSNA KUMAR

  3. 3.SONU KUMAR

  4. 4.GYANTI DEVI

  5. 5.MALA DEVI

  6. 6.RAJANTI DEVI

  7. 7.SAVITA DEVI

  8. 8.MAYA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 436/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Lutawan Mahto, Krishna Kumar, and Sonu Kumar (and four others) accused of theft, assault, and property damage in a land dispute case. Judge Geeta Gupta found the allegations against the petitioners vague and ornamental, noted the injuries were simple in nature, and observed both parties were co-landowners with no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, conditional upon cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 436/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to Lutawan Mahto, Krishna Kumar, and Sonu Kumar (and four others) accused of theft, assault, and property damage in a land dispute case. Judge Geeta Gupta found the allegations against the petitioners vague and ornamental, noted the injuries were simple in nature, and observed both parties were co-landowners with no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, conditional upon cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case