DASRATH CHAUDHARY vs State of Bihar — 140/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,5,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,1,303,2,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010024522026

Filing Number

2329/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

140/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,5,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,1,303,2,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DASRATH CHAUDHARY

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR OJHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of Dasrath Chaudhary, who was accused of assault and robbery under BNS sections. The court primarily rejected the petition on grounds of concealment of facts—the petitioner failed to disclose that his earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected by both the district court and the High Court. The court noted the serious nature of allegations, injury evidence (fractured metacarpal bone), and indicated a fresh bail application would be considered on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 140/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of Dasrath Chaudhary, who was accused of assault and robbery under BNS sections. The court primarily rejected the petition on grounds of concealment of facts—the petitioner failed to disclose that his earlier anticipatory bail application had been rejected by both the district court and the High Court. The court noted the serious nature of allegations, injury evidence (fractured metacarpal bone), and indicated a fresh bail application would be considered on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case