AMRESH PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 415/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010023162026
Filing Number
2198/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
415/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
BHORE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMRESH PANDEY
Adv. RAJESH RAI
ARUN PANDEY
AADITYA PANDEY
SHIWAN PANDEY
AMIT PANDEY
AMIT PANDEY
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 30-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 25-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Amresh, Arun, Aaditya, Shiwam, and Amit Pandey) accused under BNS Section 308(5) in a land dispute case. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the underlying dispute was civil in nature between pattidar (co-landowners), and observed no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, conditional upon cooperation in investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Amresh, Arun, Aaditya, Shiwam, and Amit Pandey) accused under BNS Section 308(5) in a land dispute case. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the underlying dispute was civil in nature between pattidar (co-landowners), and observed no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, conditional upon cooperation in investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts