AMRESH PANDEY vs State of Bihar — 415/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010023162026
Filing Number
2198/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
415/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
BHORE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMRESH PANDEY
Adv. RAJESH RAI
-
2.ARUN PANDEY
-
3.AADITYA PANDEY
-
4.SHIWAN PANDEY
-
5.AMIT PANDEY
-
6.AMIT PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Apr-2026
Order
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Amresh, Arun, Aaditya, Shiwam, and Amit Pandey) accused under BNS Section 308(5) in a land dispute case. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the underlying dispute was civil in nature between pattidar (co-landowners), and observed no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, conditional upon cooperation in investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 415/2026
Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners (Amresh, Arun, Aaditya, Shiwam, and Amit Pandey) accused under BNS Section 308(5) in a land dispute case. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted the underlying dispute was civil in nature between pattidar (co-landowners), and observed no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, conditional upon cooperation in investigation and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts