TIGER GUPTA vs State of Bihar — 118/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 385,387. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010021402026

Filing Number

2035/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED ON WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

HATHUA

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 385,387
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TIGER GUPTA

    Adv. SALAHUDDIN AHAMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, dismissed the bail petition (B.P. No. 118 of 2026) as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after discovering the petition was filed in the name of Tiger Gupta due to a clerical mistake, when it was intended for Kaptan Sah in connection with charges under IPC sections 385, 387, and the Arms Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, dismissed the bail petition (B.P. No. 118 of 2026) as withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal after discovering the petition was filed in the name of Tiger Gupta due to a clerical mistake, when it was intended for Kaptan Sah in connection with charges under IPC sections 385, 387, and the Arms Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case