RAMASARAY RAM vs State of Bihar — 385/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,116,1,118,2,78,303,2,351,2,352,3,5. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE on 07th May 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010021242026
Filing Number
2019/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
385/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
20-ADJ-VII
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NON-MAINTAINABLE
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
199
Police Station
YADAWPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMASARAY RAM
Adv. ABU SHAMIM ANSARI
-
2.RABADI DEVI
-
3.SANDEEP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramasaray Ram, Rabadi Devi, and Sandeep Kumar, who were accused of assaulting a neighbor, his wife, and son with weapons, and stealing a gold mangalsutra worth Rs. 30,000. The court found that the accused had not misused the benefits granted under Section 35 of BNSS and directed them to surrender before the trial court within 6 weeks, noting there was no current apprehension of arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ-VII
-
05-May-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
28-Apr-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
18-Apr-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
28-Mar-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
13-Mar-2026
Admission
ADJ-VII
-
12-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 385/2026
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ramasaray Ram, Rabadi Devi, and Sandeep Kumar, who were accused of assaulting a neighbor, his wife, and son with weapons, and stealing a gold mangalsutra worth Rs. 30,000. The court found that the accused had not misused the benefits granted under Section 35 of BNSS and directed them to surrender before the trial court within 6 weeks, noting there was no current apprehension of arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts