NAVNEET KHARBAR vs PUNAM DEVI — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 127. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Mislaneous
CNR: BRGO010020442026
Filing Number
96/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
2-Principal Judge
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVNEET KHARBAR
Adv. BABU LAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
PUNAM DEVI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal Judge
Disposed
LOK-NYALAYA
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent.
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | LOK-NYALAYA |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent. |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing Of Requisites & App. Of Defendent. |
| 12-02-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Navneet Kharbar v. Punam Devi (26/2026) The court disposed of the miscellaneous petition by approving a settlement agreement between petitioner Navneet Kharbar and respondent Punam Devi. Under the settlement, Kharbar agreed to pay ₹1,55,000 as lump-sum maintenance to Devi, with ₹50,000 already paid and the remaining ₹50,000 to be paid during cross-examination in the maintenance petition. The final order dated 16-07-2019 in the original maintenance case (231/2013) was accordingly set aside, and the case was disposed of based on the settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Navneet Kharbar v. Punam Devi (26/2026) The court disposed of the miscellaneous petition by approving a settlement agreement between petitioner Navneet Kharbar and respondent Punam Devi. Under the settlement, Kharbar agreed to pay ₹1,55,000 as lump-sum maintenance to Devi, with ₹50,000 already paid and the remaining ₹50,000 to be paid during cross-examination in the maintenance petition. The final order dated 16-07-2019 in the original maintenance case (231/2013) was accordingly set aside, and the case was disposed of based on the settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts