RITESH RAM vs State of Bihar — 360/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,96,352,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010020362026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1938/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

UCHAKAGAON

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,96,352,3/5

Petitioner(s)

RITESH RAM

Adv. JITENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

ADMISSION

11-02-2026

ADMISSION

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ritesh Ram in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, and 3(5). The court found that the complainant's allegations of abduction lacked direct evidence, as the complainant herself admitted in her statement that she was in a relationship with the accused and later married him; hence, no abduction occurred. Conditions: The accused was granted interim bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and depositing Rs. 10,000, subject to conditions including full cooperation in the investigation and not influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ritesh Ram in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, and 3(5). The court found that the complainant's allegations of abduction lacked direct evidence, as the complainant herself admitted in her statement that she was in a relationship with the accused and later married him; hence, no abduction occurred. Conditions: The accused was granted interim bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and depositing Rs. 10,000, subject to conditions including full cooperation in the investigation and not influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Gopalganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case