RITESH RAM vs State of Bihar — 360/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,96,352,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010020362026

Filing Number

1938/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

UCHAKAGAON

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,96,352,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITESH RAM

    Adv. JITENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ritesh Ram in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, and 3(5). The court found that the complainant's allegations of abduction lacked direct evidence, as the complainant herself admitted in her statement that she was in a relationship with the accused and later married him; hence, no abduction occurred. Conditions: The accused was granted interim bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and depositing Rs. 10,000, subject to conditions including full cooperation in the investigation and not influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Ritesh Ram in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 96, 352, and 3(5). The court found that the complainant's allegations of abduction lacked direct evidence, as the complainant herself admitted in her statement that she was in a relationship with the accused and later married him; hence, no abduction occurred. Conditions: The accused was granted interim bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and depositing Rs. 10,000, subject to conditions including full cooperation in the investigation and not influencing witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case