DEEPAK SINGH vs State of Bihar — 359/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 272,273,188,420. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010020352026

Filing Number

1937/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

359/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

267

Police Station

KUCHAIKOT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 272,273,188,420
Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK SINGH

    Adv. NIKIL KR. SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj rejected Deepak Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case (Kuchaikote P.S Case No. 267 of 2018). The court found that Singh was named in the FIR, his mobile phone was recovered from the smuggling vehicle, and a co-accused disclosed his connection to the crime; additionally, anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 359/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj rejected Deepak Singh's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case (Kuchaikote P.S Case No. 267 of 2018). The court found that Singh was named in the FIR, his mobile phone was recovered from the smuggling vehicle, and a co-accused disclosed his connection to the crime; additionally, anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case