PRABHAT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 315/2026

Case under Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010018052026

Filing Number

1722/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

315/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

4-ADJ-XIII-Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

SIDHWALIA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAT KUMAR

    Adv. RAJESHWAR PRASAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Prabhat Kumar @ Ladoo, who was accused of illegally transporting 120 liters of country-made liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2022. The court found that the petitioner had two prior criminal cases of similar nature pending, the investigation was still at an initial stage, and anticipatory bail was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Act. The petitioner was advised to surrender before the court and apply for regular bail if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-XIII-Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-1

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    ADJ-XIII-Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-1

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Prabhat Kumar @ Ladoo, who was accused of illegally transporting 120 liters of country-made liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2022. The court found that the petitioner had two prior criminal cases of similar nature pending, the investigation was still at an initial stage, and anticipatory bail was not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Act. The petitioner was advised to surrender before the court and apply for regular bail if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case