BHOLA YADAV vs State of Bihar — 313/2026

Case under Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010018022026

Filing Number

1719/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

313/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

4-ADJ-XIII-Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

HATHUA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHOLA YADAV

    Adv. Sesh Nath Rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected Bhola Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor prohibition case. The court found sufficient evidence against the petitioner, including recovery of 4.0 liters of country-made liquor from his house roof and witness identification, and held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2018. The petitioner was advised to surrender and apply for regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-XIII-Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-1

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 313/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District and Additional Sessions Judge rejected Bhola Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor prohibition case. The court found sufficient evidence against the petitioner, including recovery of 4.0 liters of country-made liquor from his house roof and witness identification, and held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2018. The petitioner was advised to surrender and apply for regular bail instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case