SABITA DEVI vs State of Bihar — 300/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,87. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010016722026

Filing Number

1593/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

300/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

BAIKUNTHPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137,2,87

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABITA DEVI

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR

  2. 2.URMILA DEVI

  3. 3.VIJAY PATEL

  4. 4.VIKASH PATEL

  5. 5.AJAY PATEL

  6. 6.NISHA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to the accused (Vikash Patel and others) in a case involving alleged kidnapping of the complainant's daughter (FIR under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS). The court found that the victim herself stated in her deposition that she married the accused of her own free will, contradicting the abduction charge, and that the couple is now living peacefully together with family consent. Consequently, the court approved the interim bail application with conditions including a bond of ₹10,000 each and cooperation with investigation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to the accused (Vikash Patel and others) in a case involving alleged kidnapping of the complainant's daughter (FIR under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS). The court found that the victim herself stated in her deposition that she married the accused of her own free will, contradicting the abduction charge, and that the couple is now living peacefully together with family consent. Consequently, the court approved the interim bail application with conditions including a bond of ₹10,000 each and cooperation with investigation proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case