ASHISH RAM vs State of Bihar — 298/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,3,115,2,118,2,109,352,352,303,3/5. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010015602026
Filing Number
1482/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
298/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
VISHAMBHARPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH RAM
Adv. BASANT GIRI
-
2.NARESH RAM
-
3.SHAILESH RAM
-
4.NELIESH RAM
-
5.BIRBAL RAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to four of five accused (Ashish Ram, Naresh Ram, Shailesh Ram, and Birbal Ram) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and assault under various IPC sections. The court found insufficient direct evidence of specific involvement in the alleged attack and noted no prior criminal history, ordering bail of ₹10,000 each with sureties and standard conditions including full cooperation in investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Admission
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 298/2026
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge granted bail to four of five accused (Ashish Ram, Naresh Ram, Shailesh Ram, and Birbal Ram) in a case involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, and assault under various IPC sections. The court found insufficient direct evidence of specific involvement in the alleged attack and noted no prior criminal history, ordering bail of ₹10,000 each with sureties and standard conditions including full cooperation in investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts