NAGENDRA YADAV vs State of Bihar — 253/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act 2016 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010013602026
Filing Number
1291/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
MIRGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAGENDRA YADAV
Adv. BASHISHTH NARAYAN YADAV
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2
Disposed
Awaiting for L. C. R.
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting for L. C. R. |
| 31-01-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nagendra Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR and fled from police after 36.4 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he abandoned, holding that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act for such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nagendra Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR and fled from police after 36.4 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he abandoned, holding that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act for such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts