NAGENDRA YADAV vs State of Bihar — 253/2026
Case under Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act 2016 Section 30A. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010013602026
Filing Number
1291/2026
Filing Date
30-Jan-2026
Registration No
253/2026
Registration Date
30-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
MIRGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGENDRA YADAV
Adv. BASHISHTH NARAYAN YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nagendra Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR and fled from police after 36.4 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he abandoned, holding that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act for such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2
-
02-Mar-2026
Awaiting for L. C. R.
ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2
-
31-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 253/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge rejected Nagendra Yadav's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR and fled from police after 36.4 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from a motorcycle he abandoned, holding that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Excise Act for such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts