GOLU PRASAD vs State of Bihar — 206/2026

Case under Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010011222026

Filing Number

1067/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

206/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

542

Police Station

MIRGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOLU PRASAD

    Adv. PRIYA RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Golu Prasad's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR, fled from the police, was identified by a local chawkidar, and 63 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from the spot, coupled with his three prior criminal cases. The court held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for L. C. R.

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Golu Prasad's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR, fled from the police, was identified by a local chawkidar, and 63 liters of country-made liquor was recovered from the spot, coupled with his three prior criminal cases. The court held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case