AJAY RAM vs State of Bihar — 202/2026

Case under Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010010792026

Filing Number

1025/2026

Filing Date

24-Jan-2026

Registration No

202/2026

Registration Date

24-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

6-ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

586

Police Station

MIRGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Excise (Amendment )Act Section 30(a)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY RAM

    Adv. GUDDU KR. SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj rejected Ajay Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case where 51.920 liters of country-made and foreign liquor were recovered near Durga Mandi. The court found that the petitioner was identified fleeing the spot, had prior criminal antecedents, and held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IV Cum Excise Act Special Court No.-2

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj rejected Ajay Ram's anticipatory bail petition in a liquor smuggling case where 51.920 liters of country-made and foreign liquor were recovered near Durga Mandi. The court found that the petitioner was identified fleeing the spot, had prior criminal antecedents, and held that anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case