KUNTI DEVI vs State of Bihar — 111/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010005232026

Filing Number

497/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

447

Police Station

UCHAKAGAON

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNTI DEVI

    Adv. DHANANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 111/2026 Summary: Kunti Devi's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry death case (Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 447/25, BNS Section 80/3(5)) was rejected. The court found that while Kunti Devi was not named in the original FIR, the prosecution alleged she conspired with other accused to kill the deceased (Lalsa Devi) due to an illicit relationship with the victim's husband. The court rejected bail based on strong circumstantial evidence including witness statements, the victim's postmortem findings (ligature marks consistent with strangulation), and Kunti Devi's alleged non-cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 111/2026 Summary: Kunti Devi's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry death case (Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 447/25, BNS Section 80/3(5)) was rejected. The court found that while Kunti Devi was not named in the original FIR, the prosecution alleged she conspired with other accused to kill the deceased (Lalsa Devi) due to an illicit relationship with the victim's husband. The court rejected bail based on strong circumstantial evidence including witness statements, the victim's postmortem findings (ligature marks consistent with strangulation), and Kunti Devi's alleged non-cooperation in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case