RUPESH KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 4795/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010223212025

Filing Number

21207/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

4795/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

PARAIYA

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,406

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.RUPESH KUMAR

Adv. SUNIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order

The Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Gaya dismissed Rupesh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition on March 12, 2026, on grounds of non-prosecution. The petitioner's counsel failed to appear on two consecutive court dates, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the bail application. The court found this abandonment sufficient to dismiss the petition without examining the merits of the charges (fraud, criminal breach of trust, and cheque dishonor). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
21-Feb-2026

Bail Matters

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
10-Feb-2026

Bail Matters

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
28-Jan-2026

Bail Matters

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
16-Jan-2026

Bail Matters

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
02-Jan-2026

Bail Matters

District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
23-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
20-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 4795/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Gaya dismissed Rupesh Kumar's anticipatory bail petition on March 12, 2026, on grounds of non-prosecution. The petitioner's counsel failed to appear on two consecutive court dates, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the bail application. The court found this abandonment sufficient to dismiss the petition without examining the merits of the charges (fraud, criminal breach of trust, and cheque dishonor). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.