RAJ MANJHI ALIAS RAJ KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 4519/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010207452025
Filing Number
19767/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
4519/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
BODHGAYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJ MANJHI ALIAS RAJ KUMAR
Adv. RAVINDRA PRASAD SINHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 10-03-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 19-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
| 18-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Raj Manjhi in a case involving alleged assault and grievous hurt. The court found the allegations against the petitioner were vague and general rather than specific, the injury report was not produced despite court orders, co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the same court, and there was insufficient evidence establishing the petitioner's direct involvement. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, valid for one month from the order date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Raj Manjhi in a case involving alleged assault and grievous hurt. The court found the allegations against the petitioner were vague and general rather than specific, the injury report was not produced despite court orders, co-accused persons had already been granted bail by the same court, and there was insufficient evidence establishing the petitioner's direct involvement. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, valid for one month from the order date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts