SHARDANAND GIRI AND OTHER vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 3824/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 127(2),115(2),118(1),109,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010171922025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
16376/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
3824/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
338
Police Station
KONCH
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHARDANAND GIRI AND OTHER
Adv. MANORANJAN PASWAN
SHATRUDHAN GIRI
BITTU KUMAR
LALAN GIRI
KALAVATI DEVI
VIJAY GIRI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Hearing History
Judge: 5-District and Additional Sessions Judge-II
Disposed
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
BAIL MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS | |
| 16-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS | |
| 09-02-2026 | BAIL MATTERS | |
| 28-01-2026 | BAIL MATTERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, partly allowed the anticipatory bail petition. The court confirmed provisional bail for petitioner no. 1 (Shardanand Giri, 80 years old) but rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners 2-6, finding the allegations serious—involving knife attacks causing eye injury, head injuries, and fractures—and noting that petitioners 2 and 6 had prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya, partly allowed the anticipatory bail petition. The court confirmed provisional bail for petitioner no. 1 (Shardanand Giri, 80 years old) but rejected anticipatory bail for petitioners 2-6, finding the allegations serious—involving knife attacks causing eye injury, head injuries, and fractures—and noting that petitioners 2 and 6 had prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts