STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Ram Swaroop Mandal vs Chhotu Mandal — 16/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,302. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
Juvenile Trial
CNR: BRGA010098122020
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
6756/2020
Filing Date
17-12-2020
Registration No
16/2020
Registration Date
17-12-2020
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
FIR Details
FIR Number
447
Police Station
SHERGHATI
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Ram Swaroop Mandal
Adv. Legacy Data Advocate
Respondent(s)
Chhotu Mandal
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Special Judge (Children Court), Gaya, rejected the bail petition of juvenile Chhotu Mandal dated 23.01.2021 in Sherghati P.S. Case No. 447/2019. The petitioner was accused of murder (section 302 IPC) and causing grievous hurt in connection with a fatal assault over a land dispute that resulted in the death of Mahendra Mandal. The court found the prosecution case supported by witness statements, injury reports, and post-mortem findings establishing internal injuries as the cause of death, and determined the serious nature of the offense warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Special Judge (Children Court), Gaya, rejected the bail petition of juvenile Chhotu Mandal dated 23.01.2021 in Sherghati P.S. Case No. 447/2019. The petitioner was accused of murder (section 302 IPC) and causing grievous hurt in connection with a fatal assault over a land dispute that resulted in the death of Mahendra Mandal. The court found the prosecution case supported by witness statements, injury reports, and post-mortem findings establishing internal injuries as the cause of death, and determined the serious nature of the offense warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts