State of Bihar vs HARISH KUMAR Advocate - UDAY KUMAR SINGH — 62/2021
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 8/20(b),(II),(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
NDPS. S. CASE
CNR: BRGA010086742021
Filing Number
6104/2021
Filing Date
23-Aug-2021
Registration No
62/2021
Registration Date
23-Aug-2021
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Adv. SADULLHA FAROOQUE
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARISH KUMAR Advocate - UDAY KUMAR SINGH
-
2.MOHIT SHARMA(Absconding)
-
3.DHEERAJ KUMAR(Absconding)
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Apr-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-May-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
01-Apr-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
26-Feb-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
25-Jan-2024
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Nov-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Oct-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Sep-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Aug-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
15-Jul-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
22-May-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Apr-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Mar-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Feb-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
15-Feb-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
31-Jan-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
21-Jan-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
13-Jan-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
11-Jan-2023
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Dec-2022
Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
15-Nov-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-Oct-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Sep-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
31-Aug-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
06-Aug-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Jul-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
30-Jun-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
09-Jun-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
17-May-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Apr-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Mar-2022
Appearence
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
08-Mar-2022
Hearing Before Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
21-Feb-2022
Hearing Before Charge
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
01-Feb-2022
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
31-Jan-2022
OrderView PDF
Summary: Bail petition of Harish Kumar, arrested on 23.08.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) for possession of 1100 kg illegal ganja recovered from a truck, was rejected/denied. The court found that despite the petitioner's claim of false implication and clean criminal record, the serious nature of the drug trafficking allegations warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jan-2022
OrderView PDF
-
19-Jan-2022
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Jan-2022
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Dec-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Dec-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Nov-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
02-Nov-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Oct-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Oct-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Sep-2021
Awaited for Ff Chargesheet
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2021
Summary: Bail petition of Harish Kumar, arrested on 23.08.2021 under NDPS Act sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(C) for possession of 1100 kg illegal ganja recovered from a truck, was rejected/denied. The court found that despite the petitioner's claim of false implication and clean criminal record, the serious nature of the drug trafficking allegations warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts