STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH RAMJI THAKUR vs ROHIT SINGH URF BUTTA — 371/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504,506/34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRGA010068742025

Filing Number

6535/2025

Filing Date

26-Apr-2025

Registration No

371/2025

Registration Date

26-Apr-2025

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

189

Police Station

Vishnupad

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,504,506/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH RAMJI THAKUR

    Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT SINGH URF BUTTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Rohit Singh @ Butta (371/2025) Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya acquitted Rohit Singh @ Butta on 21-04-2026 of all charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 506/34. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant (Ramji Thakur) alleged he was assaulted by the accused and three others on 15-10-2021, resulting in injuries, the court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's evidence. Four witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, and the investigating officer's testimony was limited to submitting the charge sheet. The only eyewitness (the complainant himself) was declared hostile, rejected by the court, and his credibility was questioned. The prosecution could not prove the accused's involvement through reliable evidence, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Statement U/S.313 Cr.p.c.

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  13. 17-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  14. 12-Jun-2025

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  15. 17-May-2025

    Charge

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  16. 28-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 26-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 371/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Bihar v. Rohit Singh @ Butta (371/2025) Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Gaya acquitted Rohit Singh @ Butta on 21-04-2026 of all charges under IPC Sections 341/34, 323/34, 307/34, 504/34, and 506/34. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant (Ramji Thakur) alleged he was assaulted by the accused and three others on 15-10-2021, resulting in injuries, the court noted critical weaknesses in the prosecution's evidence. Four witnesses testified they had no knowledge of the incident, and the investigating officer's testimony was limited to submitting the charge sheet. The only eyewitness (the complainant himself) was declared hostile, rejected by the court, and his credibility was questioned. The prosecution could not prove the accused's involvement through reliable evidence, leading to the acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case