MANOJ KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 952/2026
Case under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Section 27(c),28,28(A),36AC. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010043052026
Filing Number
4109/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
952/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
COMPLAINT CASE
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR
Adv. SNEHA PRIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Manoj Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P. 952/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Manoj Kumar, a 61-year-old employee of M/s Mahakal Agency, who was accused of selling spurious medicines (Clavam-625 tablets) without proper documentation under Sections 27(C), 28(A), and 36AC of the Drug & Cosmetic Act, 1940. The court considered his clean criminal record, advanced age, late production of purchase bills, and the fact that his co-accused wife (Anita Devi) had already been granted anticipatory bail by the same court, finding these circumstances justified granting him bail relief. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for one month, subject to BNSS Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 952/2026
Case Summary: Manoj Kumar v/s State of Bihar (A.B.P. 952/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to Manoj Kumar, a 61-year-old employee of M/s Mahakal Agency, who was accused of selling spurious medicines (Clavam-625 tablets) without proper documentation under Sections 27(C), 28(A), and 36AC of the Drug & Cosmetic Act, 1940. The court considered his clean criminal record, advanced age, late production of purchase bills, and the fact that his co-accused wife (Anita Devi) had already been granted anticipatory bail by the same court, finding these circumstances justified granting him bail relief. Conditions: Bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for one month, subject to BNSS Section 482 conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts